Memory Beta:Requests for adminship/2010s archive

Discussion
I see a lot of requests for admin task attention from Bell'Orso and this indicates to me that there is an interest in furthering activity in this area of the wiki. Group discussion on the wiki has been on autopilot for some time now, as Sulfur and myself have been editing at what i see as a minimum on the bureaucrat level without too much admin support (although i have even started to feel partially absentee, thus my desire to see responsible admin attention -- with apologies if my absenteeism has caused me to temporarily overlook any other admin necessities or group successes) -- Captain MKB 01:34, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * First off, let me say I do feel honored to be considered for admin status. However, I don't feel like I would be the right person for such a job. I don't go through dozens of pages at a time like Sulfur, just for some link fixes, or keep up with the latest releases like Mike. When I do large batches of edits or even new creations it's always about a topic that currently holds my fancy. I came across the article for the TNG Tech Manual one day (well, I didn't discover it then, I had found it long before, I just followed a link there again) and that's how my edits to phasers, probes and shuttle types came to be. The articles for individuals of the Tomol species I created because I was reading the Seekers novels at the time. Other than that I just check the Recent Changes page every once in a while and see if anything strikes my fancy and I wanna weigh in here or there. Hence only 2 to 5 minor edits a day. And then there's times when I don't feel like doing anything for a week at a time or more. I was just scrolling through my contributions and there's a gap of more than three weeks in September last year. And those requests for moves, mergers, deletions etc. are 1) not that many I don't think and 2) always only about something that is currently bugging me. I don't go perusing the wiki looking for pages that could or should be moved, merged, deleted or whatnot.


 * TL;DR: Thanks for the vote of convidence, but no thanks. I'd prefer staying an occasional "content creator/fixer" instead of becoming a full-on admin. - Bell&#39;Orso (talk) 10:55, April 12, 2015 (UTC)


 * Imho, that type of editing behavior is typical for our regulars here, and it's not a bad thing. If you focus on whatever holds your fancy at a time, that makes it your specialty. As an admin, you'll have the power to ensure those articles live up to your (and the wiki's) standards. See yourself as a cop keeping your neighborhood safe and clean. The decision is yours. -- Markonian 12:14, April 12, 2015 (UTC)


 * I have recently changed my mind about this nomination and would now be willing to accept it, should the community still uphold it. Thank you for your consideration. - Bell&#39;Orso (talk) 02:21, July 13, 2017 (UTC)


 * I am still in Support of your adminship, Bell'Orso. Kind regards, -- Markonian 15:17, July 21, 2017 (UTC)


 * Vote
 * Support -- captainmike [[file:wiki-wordmark.png|69px]] 01:37, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Support -- Markonian 18:08, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Support--Typhuss999 (talk) 04:56, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
 * Support--Humanoid21 (talk) 13:15, July 21, 2017 (UTC)