Based on the description of the Caeliar, I classified them as "non-humanoid"... but I think it's difficult to judge upon this - if anyone has good reasons to change them to "humanoid", feel free. -- Tkhobbes 06:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- The best evidence for/against comes from page 173: "Only in the broadest sense would Hernandez have described the creature as humanoid. It had a torso, two arms, two legs, one head, and a face, but any resemblance to a human ended there." --Captain Savar 22:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ultimately that still qualifies as humanoid, according to this site's definition. --TimPendragon 22:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, so I shall change the categorisation... --8of5 01:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)