Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the finale of Year Five, the Coda miniseries and the continuations of Discovery, Picard and Lower Decks; and the premieres of Prodigy and Strange New Worlds, the advent of new eras in Star Trek Online gaming, as well as other post-55th Anniversary publications. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} or {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old. Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. 'Thank You

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 5: Line 5:
 
:For those facilities where we do have concrete evidence that they were at some point destroyed, like DS9, yes we would need separate articles for each incarnation. - [[User:Bell'Orso|Bell'Orso]] ([[User talk:Bell'Orso|talk]]) 02:41, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
 
:For those facilities where we do have concrete evidence that they were at some point destroyed, like DS9, yes we would need separate articles for each incarnation. - [[User:Bell'Orso|Bell'Orso]] ([[User talk:Bell'Orso|talk]]) 02:41, February 10, 2018 (UTC)
   
::Deep Space 9 is a singular facility, so its being sequeled is understandably a new article, however some other bases have been established as complexes (with both space stations and planetary facilities), there for the destruction of part or rebuilding a planetary base in the same location, or even in a new location, can be considered the same base -- unless it happends to be a 'hero' base like DS9 or Vanguard '''''[[user:captainmike|captainmike]]''''' [[file:wiki-wordmark.png|69px]] 02:31, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
+
:Deep Space 9 is a singular facility, some have been established as complexes (with both space stations and planetary facilities), there for the destruction of part or rebuilding a planetary base in the same location can be considered the same base -- '''''[[user:captainmike|captainmike]]''''' [[file:wiki-wordmark.png|69px]] 02:31, February 12, 2018 (UTC)

Please note that all contributions to the Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)