Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Discovery and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG, Star Trek: Infinite and Star Trek Online, as well as other post-57th Anniversary publications such as the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
m (lk fix)
m (lk fix)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The three divided histories of the original Enterprise make sense, it has a huge history. But is it maybe unrequited for the other series ships. The [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E)]] page has a comprehensive history on one page, and it works, maybe just having the adventures at a glance box at the bottom of the other Enterprise's, Voyager, Defiant and DS9 would be enough and the histories could just be kept on the existing ship pages just as comprehensively as they might be on the voyages of pages. -- [[User:8of5|8of5]] 20:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 
The three divided histories of the original Enterprise make sense, it has a huge history. But is it maybe unrequited for the other series ships. The [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E)]] page has a comprehensive history on one page, and it works, maybe just having the adventures at a glance box at the bottom of the other Enterprise's, Voyager, Defiant and DS9 would be enough and the histories could just be kept on the existing ship pages just as comprehensively as they might be on the voyages of pages. -- [[User:8of5|8of5]] 20:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
   
I agree that pages such as [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)]], [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D)]], and [[USS Voyager (NCC-74656)]] should be fairly standardized but that right now they aren't. I have just begun working on the Voyager page but I don't know what the ultimate goal is. For example, should the history portion seek to be comprehensive including canon and non-canon like the Voyager page is trying to be? Comprehensive with respect to just non-canon like [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)]]? Only include a few important incidents? As for the "adventures at a glance" box, I assume that should include everything. But in what format? The pages now are each different. Some include stardates if available (which I like) and [[Deep Space 9]] doesn't even include "episode", "novel", etc. I think that references should be included and I think it looks better unlinked (like the [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)|2264-2270]] page) but linking looks fine too. Also, are specific section headings like "Chapter 12" needed for works in multiple timeframes? If they are in multiple timeframes, do we cite it multiple times like in the Chronology? I think these pages are important enough to the wiki that they are worth improving and worth discussing how we want them to look in the end. [[User:Jdvelasc|Jdvelasc]] 01:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
+
I agree that pages such as [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)]], [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D)]], and [[USS Voyager|USS Voyager (NCC-74656)]] should be fairly standardized but that right now they aren't. I have just begun working on the Voyager page but I don't know what the ultimate goal is. For example, should the history portion seek to be comprehensive including canon and non-canon like the Voyager page is trying to be? Comprehensive with respect to just non-canon like [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)]]? Only include a few important incidents? As for the "adventures at a glance" box, I assume that should include everything. But in what format? The pages now are each different. Some include stardates if available (which I like) and [[Deep Space 9]] doesn't even include "episode", "novel", etc. I think that references should be included and I think it looks better unlinked (like the [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)|2264-2270]] page) but linking looks fine too. Also, are specific section headings like "Chapter 12" needed for works in multiple timeframes? If they are in multiple timeframes, do we cite it multiple times like in the Chronology? I think these pages are important enough to the wiki that they are worth improving and worth discussing how we want them to look in the end. [[User:Jdvelasc|Jdvelasc]] 01:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
   
 
:I think [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)]] and the [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E)]] are the best so far, but both need work as do the others this page talks of.
 
:I think [[Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)]] and the [[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E)]] are the best so far, but both need work as do the others this page talks of.
Line 27: Line 27:
 
*"[[Past Prologue (episode)|Past Prologue]]"
 
*"[[Past Prologue (episode)|Past Prologue]]"
 
*"[[A Man Alone]]"
 
*"[[A Man Alone]]"
*''[[The Siege]]''
+
*''{{nov|The Siege}}''
 
*"[[Babel (episode)|Babel]]"
 
*"[[Babel (episode)|Babel]]"
 
*"[[Captive Pursuit]]"
 
*"[[Captive Pursuit]]"
Line 35: Line 35:
 
*"[[Move Along Home]]"
 
*"[[Move Along Home]]"
 
*"[[The Nagus]]"
 
*"[[The Nagus]]"
*"[[Vortex]]"
+
*"{{ep|Vortex}}"
 
*''[[Bloodletter]]''
 
*''[[Bloodletter]]''
 
*"[[Battle Lines (episode)|Battle Lines]]"
 
*"[[Battle Lines (episode)|Battle Lines]]"
Line 49: Line 49:
 
<br clear="all">
 
<br clear="all">
 
<div style="overflow:auto;height:230px;width:75%;float:left;border:1px solid black;padding-left:.5em;background-color:#ffffff;">
 
<div style="overflow:auto;height:230px;width:75%;float:left;border:1px solid black;padding-left:.5em;background-color:#ffffff;">
  +
 
====[[2370]]====
 
====[[2370]]====
 
*''[[Warchild]]''
 
*''[[Warchild]]''
Line 60: Line 61:
 
*''[[Fallen Heroes]]''
 
*''[[Fallen Heroes]]''
 
*"[[{{ed|Rules of Acquisition}}]]"
 
*"[[{{ed|Rules of Acquisition}}]]"
*"[[Necessary Evil]]"
+
*"[[{{ed|Necessary Evil}}]]"
 
*"[[Second Sight]]"
 
*"[[Second Sight]]"
 
*''[[Devil in the Sky]]''
 
*''[[Devil in the Sky]]''
 
*"[[Sanctuary (episode)|Sanctuary]]"
 
*"[[Sanctuary (episode)|Sanctuary]]"
*"[[Rivals]]"
+
*"{{ep|Rivals}}"
 
*"[[The Alternate]]"
 
*"[[The Alternate]]"
 
*"[[Armageddon Game]]"
 
*"[[Armageddon Game]]"
Line 93: Line 94:
 
*"[[Equilibrium]]"
 
*"[[Equilibrium]]"
 
*"[[Second Skin]]"
 
*"[[Second Skin]]"
*"[[The Abandoned]]"
+
*"{{ep|The Abandoned}}"
 
*"[[Civil Defense]]"
 
*"[[Civil Defense]]"
 
*"[[{{ed|Meridian}}]]"
 
*"[[{{ed|Meridian}}]]"
Line 99: Line 100:
 
*"[[Fascination]]"
 
*"[[Fascination]]"
 
*''[[The Laertian Gamble]]''
 
*''[[The Laertian Gamble]]''
*"[[Past Tense (episodes)|Past Tense]]"
+
*"[[Past Tense, Part I]]"
  +
*"[[Past Tense, Part II]]"
 
*"[[Life Support]]"
 
*"[[Life Support]]"
 
*"[[Heart of Stone]]"
 
*"[[Heart of Stone]]"
Line 118: Line 120:
 
*''[[Objective: Bajor]]''
 
*''[[Objective: Bajor]]''
 
*''[[Time's Enemy]]''
 
*''[[Time's Enemy]]''
*''[[Saratoga]]''
+
*''{{nov|Saratoga}}''
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<br clear="all">
 
<br clear="all">
Line 138: Line 140:
 
*"[[Homefront]]"
 
*"[[Homefront]]"
 
*"[[Paradise Lost (episode)|Paradise Lost]]"
 
*"[[Paradise Lost (episode)|Paradise Lost]]"
*"[[Reflections (Graf)|Reflections]]"
+
*"[[Reflections (DS9)|Reflections]]"
 
*''[[Armageddon Sky]]''
 
*''[[Armageddon Sky]]''
 
*"[[Crossfire]]"
 
*"[[Crossfire]]"
Line 204: Line 206:
 
*"[[Favor the Bold]]"
 
*"[[Favor the Bold]]"
 
*"[[Sacrifice of Angels (episode)|Sacrifice of Angels]]"
 
*"[[Sacrifice of Angels (episode)|Sacrifice of Angels]]"
*"[[You are Cordially Invited...]]"
+
*"[[You Are Cordially Invited]]"
 
*"[[Resurrection]]"
 
*"[[Resurrection]]"
 
*"[[Statistical Probabilities]]"
 
*"[[Statistical Probabilities]]"
Line 235: Line 237:
 
*"[[Afterimage]]"
 
*"[[Afterimage]]"
 
*"[[Take Me Out to the Holosuite]]"
 
*"[[Take Me Out to the Holosuite]]"
*"[[Chrysalis (episode)|Chrysalis]]"
+
*"{{ep|Chrysalis}}"
 
*"[[Treachery, Faith, and the Great River]]"
 
*"[[Treachery, Faith, and the Great River]]"
 
*"[[Once More Unto the Breach]]"
 
*"[[Once More Unto the Breach]]"
Line 249: Line 251:
 
*"[[Penumbra]]"
 
*"[[Penumbra]]"
 
*"[['Til Death Do Us Part]]"
 
*"[['Til Death Do Us Part]]"
*"[[Strange Bedfellows]]"
+
*"{{ep|Strange Bedfellows}}"
 
*"[[The Changing Face of Evil]]"
 
*"[[The Changing Face of Evil]]"
 
*"[[When It Rains...]]"
 
*"[[When It Rains...]]"
 
*"[[Tacking Into the Wind]]"
 
*"[[Tacking Into the Wind]]"
 
*"[[Extreme Measures]]"
 
*"[[Extreme Measures]]"
*"[[The Dogs of War]]"
+
*"{{ep|The Dogs of War}}"
 
*''[[What You Leave Behind]]''
 
*''[[What You Leave Behind]]''
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 267: Line 269:
 
*''[[Demons of Air and Darkness]]''
 
*''[[Demons of Air and Darkness]]''
 
*"[[Horn and Ivory]]"
 
*"[[Horn and Ivory]]"
*''[[Twilight]]''
+
*{{nov|Twilight}}
 
*''[[This Gray Spirit]]''
 
*''[[This Gray Spirit]]''
 
*''[[Cathedral]]''
 
*''[[Cathedral]]''
 
*''[[Lesser Evil]]''
 
*''[[Lesser Evil]]''
 
*''[[Rising Son]]''
 
*''[[Rising Son]]''
*''[[Unity]]''
+
*''{{nov|Unity}}''
 
*"[[Trill: Unjoined]]"
 
*"[[Trill: Unjoined]]"
 
*"[[Bajor: Fragments and Omens]]"
 
*"[[Bajor: Fragments and Omens]]"

Latest revision as of 10:36, 9 October 2019

Ten ForwardVoyages of... pages (Reply | Watch)

The three divided histories of the original Enterprise make sense, it has a huge history. But is it maybe unrequited for the other series ships. The USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E) page has a comprehensive history on one page, and it works, maybe just having the adventures at a glance box at the bottom of the other Enterprise's, Voyager, Defiant and DS9 would be enough and the histories could just be kept on the existing ship pages just as comprehensively as they might be on the voyages of pages. -- 8of5 20:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree that pages such as USS Enterprise (NCC-1701), USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D), and USS Voyager (NCC-74656) should be fairly standardized but that right now they aren't. I have just begun working on the Voyager page but I don't know what the ultimate goal is. For example, should the history portion seek to be comprehensive including canon and non-canon like the Voyager page is trying to be? Comprehensive with respect to just non-canon like Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270)? Only include a few important incidents? As for the "adventures at a glance" box, I assume that should include everything. But in what format? The pages now are each different. Some include stardates if available (which I like) and Deep Space 9 doesn't even include "episode", "novel", etc. I think that references should be included and I think it looks better unlinked (like the 2264-2270 page) but linking looks fine too. Also, are specific section headings like "Chapter 12" needed for works in multiple timeframes? If they are in multiple timeframes, do we cite it multiple times like in the Chronology? I think these pages are important enough to the wiki that they are worth improving and worth discussing how we want them to look in the end. Jdvelasc 01:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I think Voyages of the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701) (2264 to 2270) and the USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-E) are the best so far, but both need work as do the others this page talks of.
For the article segment I think the 1071 five-year mission layout is spot on, by year then headed by stardate if know. For this segment I think only canon information which is required knowledge for non-canon on the page and very major events should be noted, and it must also be relative to the ship not the adventures of the crew (not that they don’t go hand in hand).
For the mission logs I'd go:
  • stardate: Title (series format) - subdivide if required
And I'd say don't link the series and format in the mission log listing, and do list canon title there too. --8of5 02:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Since no one else has responded, I will do as 8of5 suggests. A few more nitpicky questions - right now in the Voyager Mission logs, I list things such as -- *Strange New Worlds I: "Fiction" (VOY Short story) -- I like the SNW heading, but this could be deleted. Right now I don't list the book numbers like "(VOY novel #14)" but of course I could easily do that. There is also the question of what to do with alternate timelines. Just place them right in the mix - maybe try to make a note of where they come from? And does anyone like the mini-edit boxes that allow users to edit say just the "2372" portion of the mission logs? This is how it is currently done on the Deep Space 9 page. I believe this should just about determine exactly how the Mission Logs (or should it be "Adventures at a Glance"?) should look. Jdvelasc 22:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd say yes for noting the anthology of miniseries first, so like this:

  • stardate: Miniseries: Title (series format) - subdivide if required (alternate timeline)

With the last section used to note alternate timelines, flashbacks, holodeck reacreations, etc. As for using subheadings in the mission logs section, I'd say yes, it does make the contents list abit long at the top but is handy not to have to scroll through, another option could be to break the whole list up by year into seperate boxes, which just taking what is currently on the DS9 page looks like this:

Mission Logs










Quite long, but does give the scroll wheel a rest. -- 8of5 23:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)