Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Discovery and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG, Star Trek: Infinite and Star Trek Online, as well as other post-57th Anniversary publications such as the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Advertisement

This page lists past nominations for Memory Beta:Good Articles in 2008

Successful[]

Ardanan[]

A well written, informative and in-depth article created by Mr. 75. Maybe enough information isn't available for an FA, but definitely worthy of GA status. --The Doctor 11:14, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

Votes[]

  • Yes --The Doctor 11:14, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes --8of5 01:34, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes -- Seventy-5 is an able writer, as long as you don't make the mistake of directly addressing him. -- Captain MKB 18:26, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
    • So much nicer that you snark against me indirectly, Cap. --75.168.144.30 19:23, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks! I mean it though -- you write good articles! -- Captain MKB 19:28, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

USS Confederate[]

A detailed and informative article, worthy of GA status. --The Doctor 10:50, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Votes[]

  • Yes --The Doctor 10:50, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes --8of5 01:34, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes -- Thanks for noticing, Doc. -- Captain MKB 18:27, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

The Cage[]

It has red links but the rest of it looks pretty good to me. With a little work it could probably be Featured.--Long Live the United Earth 23:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Support - looks well fleshed out to me. --8of5 00:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured article down grades[]

Romulan Neutral Zone[]

The doctor suggested downgrading this one with the above suggestions.

  • Object - I think this article is still good enough for featured status. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Worf, son of Mogh[]

The doctor suggested downgrading this one with the above suggestions.

  • Support - This is long and well done, especially the post DS9 sections, however the Enterprise-D and DS9 section is hugely underdeveloped, so the page can’t really be considered complete enough for featured. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The Siege[]

This page has a huge summary (maybe too huge) while the rest is somewhat underdeveloped, of the small selection of references there are quite a few red links so not ideal for a featured article. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Jean-Luc Picard[]

The page is comprehensive and well written, however it cant possibly be covering everything about Picard yet, the Enterprise-D years seem particularly under developed. Unfortunately with a main character like this it could be a long time before absolutely everything we have to cover will be covered. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Support: I'd have to agree on this one. While the article was well developed and deserving of FA status when Turtletrekker and myself were working on it a few years back, it is now lacking somewhat, but is still a good article. If I do say so myself :D --Bok 09:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

First nominees[]

The doctor suggested the following might be suitable for good article status:

autopsy[]

  • Support --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Columbia (NX-02)[]

  • Support - This could be expanded some, but pretty much everything we know is there, so it's good enough for good I think. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)[]

  • Support - There are some missing bits, but those which are done are done very well. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Excelsior-class[]

  • Support--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Flax[]

  • Support - doesn't jump out at me, but everything about it good...--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Q[]

  • Support - I don't think it's up to FA quality yet, but certainly comprehensive enough for goodness. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The Sorrows of Empire (possibly FA)[]

  • Support - Too many red links for FA but sufficiently well developed for good i think. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Failed[]

First nominees[]

The doctor suggested the following might be suitable for good article status:

assassination[]

  • Object - I think this one is a little far from perfect for being a good article, it's not even all written from the in-universe perspective. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Domenica Corsi[]

  • Neutral - I don’t know enough about this subject to make a judgement on it's goodness. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Ikat'ika[]

  • Neutral - over use of brackets bugs me a bit.--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Martyr (possibly FA)[]

  • Object - has a long summary but little else. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Neyel[]

  • Support - quite a lot of red links but comprehensive. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Object - Per Emperorkalan's observation. --8of5 17:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Object (for now) - History is incomplete: how do they get from ~200 light years from earth to the the Large Magellanic Cloud--Emperorkalan 14:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Tal Shiar[]

  • Object - Way to much knowingly missing. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement