FANDOM


This page lists past nominations for Memory Beta:Good Articles in 2008

SuccessfulEdit

ArdananEdit

A well written, informative and in-depth article created by Mr. 75. Maybe enough information isn't available for an FA, but definitely worthy of GA status. --The Doctor 11:14, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

VotesEdit

  • Yes --The Doctor 11:14, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes --8of5 01:34, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes -- Seventy-5 is an able writer, as long as you don't make the mistake of directly addressing him. -- Captain MKB 18:26, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
    • So much nicer that you snark against me indirectly, Cap. --75.168.144.30 19:23, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks! I mean it though -- you write good articles! -- Captain MKB 19:28, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

USS ConfederateEdit

A detailed and informative article, worthy of GA status. --The Doctor 10:50, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

VotesEdit

  • Yes --The Doctor 10:50, September 17, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes --8of5 01:34, September 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes -- Thanks for noticing, Doc. -- Captain MKB 18:27, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

The CageEdit

It has red links but the rest of it looks pretty good to me. With a little work it could probably be Featured.--Long Live the United Earth 23:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Support - looks well fleshed out to me. --8of5 00:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Featured article down gradesEdit

Romulan Neutral ZoneEdit

The doctor suggested downgrading this one with the above suggestions.

  • Object - I think this article is still good enough for featured status. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Worf, son of MoghEdit

The doctor suggested downgrading this one with the above suggestions.

  • Support - This is long and well done, especially the post DS9 sections, however the Enterprise-D and DS9 section is hugely underdeveloped, so the page can’t really be considered complete enough for featured. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The SiegeEdit

This page has a huge summary (maybe too huge) while the rest is somewhat underdeveloped, of the small selection of references there are quite a few red links so not ideal for a featured article. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Jean-Luc PicardEdit

The page is comprehensive and well written, however it cant possibly be covering everything about Picard yet, the Enterprise-D years seem particularly under developed. Unfortunately with a main character like this it could be a long time before absolutely everything we have to cover will be covered. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Support: I'd have to agree on this one. While the article was well developed and deserving of FA status when Turtletrekker and myself were working on it a few years back, it is now lacking somewhat, but is still a good article. If I do say so myself :D --Bok 09:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

First nomineesEdit

The doctor suggested the following might be suitable for good article status:

autopsyEdit

  • Support --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Columbia (NX-02)Edit

  • Support - This could be expanded some, but pretty much everything we know is there, so it's good enough for good I think. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)Edit

  • Support - There are some missing bits, but those which are done are done very well. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Excelsior-classEdit

  • Support--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

FlaxEdit

  • Support - doesn't jump out at me, but everything about it good...--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

QEdit

  • Support - I don't think it's up to FA quality yet, but certainly comprehensive enough for goodness. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The Sorrows of Empire (possibly FA)Edit

  • Support - Too many red links for FA but sufficiently well developed for good i think. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

FailedEdit

First nomineesEdit

The doctor suggested the following might be suitable for good article status:

assassinationEdit

  • Object - I think this one is a little far from perfect for being a good article, it's not even all written from the in-universe perspective. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Domenica CorsiEdit

  • Neutral - I don’t know enough about this subject to make a judgement on it's goodness. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Ikat'ikaEdit

  • Neutral - over use of brackets bugs me a bit.--8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Martyr (possibly FA)Edit

  • Object - has a long summary but little else. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

NeyelEdit

  • Support - quite a lot of red links but comprehensive. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Object - Per Emperorkalan's observation. --8of5 17:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Object (for now) - History is incomplete: how do they get from ~200 light years from earth to the the Large Magellanic Cloud--Emperorkalan 14:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Tal ShiarEdit

  • Object - Way to much knowingly missing. --8of5 22:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.