Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Discovery and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG, Star Trek: Infinite and Star Trek Online, as well as other post-57th Anniversary publications such as the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Advertisement

A good article is an article which is considered a good example of a well made page, but not yet up to the desired standards of a featured article.

For a list of all Memory Beta's good articles see: Category:Memory Beta good articles

Nominations

To nominate an article for good article status simply list it below with a brief explanation of why you think it is good, if the article can gain the support of at least one established member of the community and receives no objections the article may receive good status and should have the following template added {{good}}.

The Mark of Gideon

Supports

  1. -- Captain MKB 01:44, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • As of now, this article lacks a long summary, and possible expansion image gallery. I think the article will be appropriate and attractive for the main page with the addition of even a short, spoiler-free summary to illustrate the theme of the source, and a format cleanup. The attention gained on the main page featured article section will probably lead new users to complete sections. -- Captain MKB 03:41, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

The Royale

Supports

  1. -- Captain MKB 01:44, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • As of now, this article lacks a long summary and possible expansion of image gallery. I think the article will be appropriate and attractive for the main page with the addition of even a short, spoiler-free summary to illustrate the theme of the source, and a format cleanup. The attention gained on the main page featured article section will probably lead new users to complete all sections. -- Captain MKB 03:40, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Nemesis (episode)

Supports

  1. -- Captain MKB 01:44, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

  • As of now, this article lacks a long summary,and possible larger image gallery. I think the article will be appropriate and attractive for the main page with the addition of even a short, spoiler-free summary to illustrate the theme of the source, and a format cleanup. The attention gained on the main page featured article section will probably lead new users to complete it. -- Captain MKB 03:39, February 4, 2017 (UTC)

Miranda class starships

Supports

  1. -- Captain MKB 01:44, January 29, 2017 (UTC)
  2. -- ~~~~

Objections

Comments

  • As of now, this article lacks some follow through with sectional charting of the ships listed. I think the article will be appropriate and attractive for the main page with the addition of even a short, spoiler-free summary to illustrate the theme of the topic, and a format cleanup. The attention gained on the main page featured article section will probably lead new users to complete the chart list. -- Captain MKB 03:36, February 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Non-canon sources may appear contradictory, making starship listings tricky. This article is a great example of compiling the source data in a list while also separating logically between types/sub-classes, thus setting an example for similar articles. Imho. -- ~~~~

Past nominations

Advertisement