Emperorkalan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Captainmike (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::That sounds more like an artifact of how the pages were initially developed, rather than any deliberate conforming to a policy. Is the novel a separate novel? Or a novelization?--[[User:Emperorkalan|Emperorkalan]] 19:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
::That sounds more like an artifact of how the pages were initially developed, rather than any deliberate conforming to a policy. Is the novel a separate novel? Or a novelization?--[[User:Emperorkalan|Emperorkalan]] 19:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::Both Metamorphosis and The Siege are novels that have nothing to do with their episodic namesakes -- not novelizations at all. -- [[User:Captainmike|Captain M.K.B.]] 19:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:07, 8 February 2007
Shouldn't an article like The Siege be called "The Siege (novel)" to distinguish it from the episode? It seems weird to privilege the novel over the episode. Is there a general policy about articles that states we should always disambiguate vs. privilege the most common or whatever? Jdvelasc 18:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- -This is how Metamorphosis works. Jdvelasc 18:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds more like an artifact of how the pages were initially developed, rather than any deliberate conforming to a policy. Is the novel a separate novel? Or a novelization?--Emperorkalan 19:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Both Metamorphosis and The Siege are novels that have nothing to do with their episodic namesakes -- not novelizations at all. -- Captain M.K.B. 19:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds more like an artifact of how the pages were initially developed, rather than any deliberate conforming to a policy. Is the novel a separate novel? Or a novelization?--Emperorkalan 19:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)