Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Discovery and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG, Star Trek: Infinite and Star Trek Online, as well as other post-57th Anniversary publications such as the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Register
Advertisement

i'm pretty sure the RPG didn't use the Chronology dating system. did we just make up the date of 2300, or is there some conversion at work here? -- Captain M.K.B. 13:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll verify that FASA didn't use the Chronology dates (they didn't even exist when FASA had the license), they used Reference stardates, a modification of the SFC system. It's items like this that were part of the reason I spent time developing the SFC pages: the 2300 date is probably (but I don't know for sure) taken from one of the "kitchen sink" timeline makers (the guys who include everything from FASA, Star Fleet Battles, Fanon, etc.). If we note the actual dates given here and give our own possible adaptations, we'll know where the number comes from. Fortunately, the Intelligence book noted is one of the ones I recently unearthed from a trip to my parents' attic, so I'll see if I can find the reference stardate and other relevant information.--Emperorkalan 14:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement