Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! As always, the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Strange New Worlds and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG and Star Trek Online, as well as other eventful releases such as Section 31, the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

Disambig from 24th century class[]

Besides this class being old by the 2270s, is there any other reason this could not be the same as the 24th century Capella class? We have ancient classes like the Daedalus get retired and revived several times (VAN, STO)? Kind regards, -- Markonian 19:53, May 31, 2019 (UTC)

I'm ok with merging them. the revival of ancient classes with new tech in STO actually opens the door to consider many unseen classes as precursors to their futuristic variants.
the original precedent for this is the Constitution - the early modification and the refit are vastly different but they share the same class name - captainmike 13:37, June 1, 2019 (UTC)
That's cool with me. Kind regards, -- Markonian 18:28, June 1, 2019 (UTC)