Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! At present the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Discovery and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG, Star Trek: Infinite and Star Trek Online, as well as other post-57th Anniversary publications such as the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki
Advertisement

I believe that in this episode in the alternate future there is a reference to the tenth anniversary of the 23 year voyage of Voyager which would place this story in 2404 just as it is listed here (and on sites like Memoryalpha.) But the Pocket Books Timeline in Voyages of Imagination places the story (and concurrent stories like "Don't Cry" in 2403. Any ideas about the discrepancy? Jdvelasc 20:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

The 2377/2378 controversy. -- Tough Little Ship 18:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I have never heard of such a controversy. Where is a good place to read the relevant information? I assume this controversy is about the dating of the episode Endgame and when Voyager actually gets home. Looking at the Stardate given in the episode, it would seem that they arrived home in 2377. What is the evidence that it should be 2378? Did they say it took seven years to get home? Jdvelasc 22:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

The controversy started with "Homestead", where Neelix stated that it was the 315th anniversary of first contact between humans and Vulcans. This would place this story and following stories in 2378, which contravenes the standard 1 season=1 year pattern. This led to the controversy of whether Endgame took place in 2377 or 2378, though I go with it being 2377. --The Doctor 22:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see. Thank you for your response. To provide consistency and avoid edit wars, it would seem that Memory Beta should have a standard date for the relevant episodes/events. I would say that dates that we put on the Memory Beta Chronology (which is recently looking extra nice by the way) should be the "official" dates for the rest of the wiki. So - in this case, which should it be? Jdvelasc 23:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement