Problems with this article[]
- The statement that this is "probably" the name of the class because the ship has an NX registry barely passes muster in my opinion. there have been other classes where there are multiple NX ships and therefore the foremost NX prototype is NOT the name of the class. I'll let other uses weigh in on this, but i'm getting the impression the creator of this article is grasping at straws in a lot of cases.
- Looking over this again, i can see this seems to be the only ship of this type? I'll relent that this is sensible as a class name
- There's a whole paragraph describing the Nova class at the beginning of the article - is the implication that the Galen class is a subclass of the Nova class? I'd say no on that, the Galen class is mostly a different configuration. Unless there's a source for this association it should be removed. At the very least, the paragraph should be altered to reference the Galen class in some way.
captainmike 
16:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)