I'm wondering several things:
1) Considering the different sizes of ships, would it be more appropriate to describe it as not so much a classification as a design lineage or design type? Because that's the main link between the small versions and the large ones; if they had different designs, you wouldn't even think to group them together.
2) Would the K'vort Cha class count as a BoP? I'm thinking it's a borderline case (see the Dominion Wars Art Director's Notes on the ship for a better view).
3) Have to add the FASA versions (3 of them: two correspond to the B'rel and K'vort, but there's another one between them).--Emperorkalan 17:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- 1) Hmm maybe, the earlier smaller ones are a classification I think but later on in the lineage they branch out more, so it might be better to say they began as a classification and then got all popular and went and did anything with them.
- 2) It looks like one, and has a similar name to one, but isn't actually identified as one anywhere, whilst on the same site the B'rel class is identified in it's title as a Bird-of-Prey.
- 3) Go for it :). --8of5 17:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
duplicated information[]
Is it necesary to have a paragraph for every type here? isn't all the information about each type contained in its own page? -- Captain MKB 15:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, you could make this little more than a disambiguation page. But I think that would be less useful to a user looking for some basic information on Klingon Birds-of-Prey in general rather than any specific class. --8of5 15:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, that was going to be the point of the table I created -- to list datas on each type, possibly even work in a picture from the lower sections, enabling me to delete all the rest of the duplicated info. You've taken the initiative and broken that table up into assorted pieces, which I feel dilutes its purpose. I know you are trying to collaborate with me, but it feels like you've removed the purpose of that edit. -- Captain MKB 16:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- There we go, the table restored to a single undiluted listing along side a single undiluted text outlining Klingon Birds-of-Prey in general. Let us have our cake and eat it. --8of5 03:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, that was going to be the point of the table I created -- to list datas on each type, possibly even work in a picture from the lower sections, enabling me to delete all the rest of the duplicated info. You've taken the initiative and broken that table up into assorted pieces, which I feel dilutes its purpose. I know you are trying to collaborate with me, but it feels like you've removed the purpose of that edit. -- Captain MKB 16:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)