Conjecture on the value of a brick[]
I did some numbers based on the volumes of the units of currency. I first thought that the ratio of latinum to gold has to increase, because a bar isn't 2000 times larger than a slip. So the number crunching involved calculating the volumes of the units, converting to cc, and they came up as this:
slip----10.24192cm³
strip---71.69341cm³ (slip x 7)
bar----102.4192cm³ (slip x 10)
brick--524.3860cm³ (slip x ~51,2)
strips have 100 times the value of slips, but 7 times the volume of strips, 100/7= ~14,3
bars have 2000 times the value of slips, but 10 times the volume of strips, 2000/10= 200
Bricks have ~51,2 the volume of slips
100/7= ~14,3
(100/7)^2 = ~204,08
(100/7)^3 = ~2915,45
I had a hunch about the amount of latinum per cc of the brick (thus ratio of gold to latinum). Strips are 100 slips, but only around seven times the volume. Bars are 2000 slips, but 10 times the volume. A strip has around 14,3 times the amount of latinum per cc as a slip, and by rough numbers a bar has the same multiplier when compared to a strip. I have come to the conclusion that the density of latinum increases by exponents of ~14,3 (exact would be 100/7) per step. Thus a likely value for a brick of latinum under this conjecture would be 150 thousand slips.
I'll throw out rounding errors as imperfect modeling of the items, as they're heavily carved and stamped, rather than being mathematically perfect hexahedra.
This also brings into question how small a slip-sized unit of latinum is, since a ~10mL worth of latinum is worth a hundred bricks. So if a brick contains a total of ~100 microliters of latinum, a slip only has ~2/3 nanoliters suspended in the entire piece, thus about 0,0667 nanoliters per cc.
So 66,67 parts per trillion (by volume), with each larger denomination having ~14,3 times the density of latinum vs gold as the previous unit. So an increase in density of latinum suspended in the gold and an increase in overall volume add value to the denominations.
88.114.108.203 01:15, July 4, 2018 (UTC)
- That's certainly interesting, but if you were looking for permission to work this into the main body of the article then I'm afraid I'm gonna have to disappoint you. Memory Beta only accepts information coming from official (episodes & movies) and licensed (novels, comics, reference works, etc) sources, so unless you can provide such a source, these calculations will have to stay here on this talk page. - Bell'Orso (talk) 01:38, July 4, 2018 (UTC)
- Not looking for an addition to the article, but more about airing an idea. Since there isn't any solid word on the value of a brick, might as well go with an educated guess in the background. - 88.114.108.203 10:49, July 4, 2018 (UTC)
Latinum replication[]
We know latinum is a currency because it cannot be counterfeited. But where is it stated (in canon) that latinum cannot be replicated? And, if latinum cannot be replicated, can latinum be transported (through a transporter beam)? 2001:569:7642:C200:A147:45C8:639C:A8D7 19:07, September 15, 2018 (UTC)