m (Talk:Star Trek: Legacy moved to Talk:Legacy (game): Simplification of title.) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Just a note about Fed starship classes: after having paged through the strategy book, the Akula class is not the one we have [[Akula class|here already]], from [[Star Trek: Starfleet Command]]. Instead, it's the ''Akula'' variant of the ''Akyazi'' class perimeter action ship from [[Ships of the Star Fleet]]. So the variant, if not the Akyazi itself, has now been "adopted" into sphere of licensed materials. However, this begs the question of how we're going to handle the designation "Akula class".--[[User:Emperorkalan|Emperorkalan]] 13:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC) |
Just a note about Fed starship classes: after having paged through the strategy book, the Akula class is not the one we have [[Akula class|here already]], from [[Star Trek: Starfleet Command]]. Instead, it's the ''Akula'' variant of the ''Akyazi'' class perimeter action ship from [[Ships of the Star Fleet]]. So the variant, if not the Akyazi itself, has now been "adopted" into sphere of licensed materials. However, this begs the question of how we're going to handle the designation "Akula class".--[[User:Emperorkalan|Emperorkalan]] 13:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | Admiral Kirk is in command of the USS Enterprise-A in this game. Slight mistake there... – [[User:AT2Howell|AT2Howell]] 00:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:54, 13 December 2007
Just a note about Fed starship classes: after having paged through the strategy book, the Akula class is not the one we have here already, from Star Trek: Starfleet Command. Instead, it's the Akula variant of the Akyazi class perimeter action ship from Ships of the Star Fleet. So the variant, if not the Akyazi itself, has now been "adopted" into sphere of licensed materials. However, this begs the question of how we're going to handle the designation "Akula class".--Emperorkalan 13:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Admiral Kirk is in command of the USS Enterprise-A in this game. Slight mistake there... – AT2Howell 00:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)