Sorry if the changes are disliked, but they are fact as of 2006. Technically they were fact way before 2006, but let's not go there... [User: Stripey1].
- Sorry friend, all I was doing was moving the planets and moons into a proper line-up and made an error with Pluto. Please accept my apologies.
No no no no no. MY changes. Your changes didn't revert Sector 001 to what we all thought it was like a month ago. I referred to MY changes.
- Pish-posh on all of this! Pluto will always be a planet to me. (-; --Turtletrekker 22:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
BTW, Stripey when you post in discussions, look for the little square boxes right above the edit box. If you click on the next to last one (the one just beyond the "W" with a circle around it) you will see two of these -- and four of these. Turtletrekker 22:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC) This will add your name and time-stamp to your post. --Turtletrekker 22:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Just to explain my edit for Ceres, the indent after Mars incorrectly implied it was a moon of Mars (see Luna and Titan, for example). --Emperorkalan 01:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
No problemo. --Stripey 14:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Science or Fiction?[]
The recent discussion on the moon page raised an issue, should this page, as it currently is, reflect current scientific understanding or what is presented in the Trekverse as fact? The most recent reference that covers the topic, Star Trek: Star Charts was published before the planets were reclassified, the older The Worlds of the Federation says the Sol system has ten planets. I'm sure a novel will make a nod to the new system eventually, but for now nothing in the Trekverse explains the Sol system as the current scientific community understands it, and for all we know they could change it all back by 22nd 23rd or 24th centuries. So what do we do? --8of5 12:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Planetoids and moons[]
Trinculo was the name of a starship. It was named for the moon. While there isn't an article for the moon, there is one for the ship which references the moon. – AT2Howell 15:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- There should not be an article about the moon, so don't write links about it. The moon was never mentioned in a Star Trek book. -- Captain MKB 16:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)