Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! As always, the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Strange New Worlds and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG and Star Trek Online, as well as other eventful releases such as Section 31, the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

An IP user just added info on the stories placing them at various times, all of which opposed to placements in the Pocket timeline where they all occur in 2277, any input on which we should go for? -- 8of5 14:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The anonymous user is probably Stripey. And as for the placement of stories, I would plump for the placement in our chronology and the Voyages of Imagination timeline. --The Doctor 14:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
In which case, do we just remove Stripey's explinations in favour of the Pocket dates? -- 8of5 14:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
I should say so as all of the articles are in need of proper formatting anyway. --The Doctor 14:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC).

I realise totally that the formatting is awful. Seeing as there was no information, I just thought it needed starting. The chronology for them is obviously best handed over to Voyages of the Imagination. My datings clearly say they are guesses, and they were made prior to the existence of books such as Ex Machina. Again, I wanted the articles to have a start, though I knew they'd need work from others afterward. [User: Stripey].