Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

A friendly reminder regarding spoilers! As always, the expanded Trek universe is in a period of major upheaval with the continuations of Strange New Worlds and Prodigy, the advent of new eras in gaming with the Star Trek Adventures RPG and Star Trek Online, as well as other eventful releases such as Section 31, the ongoing IDW Star Trek comic and spin-off Star Trek: Defiant. Therefore, please be courteous to other users who may not be aware of current developments by using the {{spoiler}}, {{spoilers}} OR {{majorspoiler}} tags when adding new information from sources less than six months old (even if it is minor info). Also, please do not include details in the summary bar when editing pages and do not anticipate making additions relating to sources not yet in release. THANK YOU

READ MORE

Memory Beta, non-canon Star Trek Wiki

This story is placed in 2371 in The Star Trek Fiction Timeline which I think we are using as the basis for the Memory Beta Chronology correct? Is there some reason to think that it is wrong? Jdvelasc 06:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what we are using as a basis for M-B Chronology (or, quite frankly, why we're wasting so many bits in this database on chronological matters in the first place). But, IIRC, I'd picked 2374 because that was the "current" year when the story was written/published, and there was no other info to indicate specific placement anywhere else.--Seventy 15:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Then really should any date be given so definitively, I don't feel it's really correct to give dates based on the Pocket timeline, MB Chronology or user interpretation if none is given in the story. It might be appropriate to give a speculative note in the information section but not state a date as a fact when there is no fact to state. -- 8of5 14:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)