UESPArules (talk | contribs) |
UESPArules (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
•USS Enterprise (NCC-1701 2230s) |
•USS Enterprise (NCC-1701 2230s) |
||
--[[User:FaNbOy1988|FaNbOy1988]] ([[User talk:FaNbOy1988|talk]]) 01:08, June 8, 2013 (UTC) |
--[[User:FaNbOy1988|FaNbOy1988]] ([[User talk:FaNbOy1988|talk]]) 01:08, June 8, 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | I'd say either the third or fourth ones. In order to match our other articles it should have the registry number.--[[User:UESPArules|Long Live the United Earth]] ([[User talk:UESPArules|talk]]) 03:12, June 8, 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:12, 8 June 2013
In service
The U.S.S. Enterprise predecessor was likely in service 2235 - 2257.
- How do you figure? --FaNbOy1988 (talk) 23:09, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
Registry
I would speculate NCC-0701 to follow the U.S.S. Kelvin registry of NCC-0514.
Tedpronj (talk) 05:12, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- The registry of the ship is NCC-1701, visible on the inside of a nacelle in the top picture of the article. –-- Markonian 09:57, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- OMG, Markonian is right, it is NCC-1701, man I'm blind. --FaNbOy1988 (talk) 10:33, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
Ship Class
Based on the picture from the comic, the Enterprise predecessor resembles a Constitution Class vessel. Possily the predecessor could be Constitution and the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 could be a Constitution II.
Tedpronj (talk) 05:12, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- We don't know. But it looks like a Constitution-class vessel to me. –-- Markonian 09:57, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
Is it possible that the Enterprise we've seen in the films is a refit of this one? - Nx1701g (talk) 12:59, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Is there anywhere in the comic that directly says April commanded a predecessor starship? Or is that just supposition that assumes the Enterprise's launch in Star Trek was it's first launch and not a refit?--Long Live the United Earth (talk) 20:12, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
He does say "I'm Robert April, former captain of a ship called Enterprise" in Countdown to Darkness, Number One. --FaNbOy1988 (talk) 23:12, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- So April could just be the former captain of the same Enterprise? and then the events of 2009's Star Trek are just a relaunch of the ship rather than its debut?--Long Live the United Earth (talk) 03:11, June 8, 2013 (UTC)
Article title
Based on the ship's registry, do we have ideas for a new article title?--Long Live the United Earth (talk) 20:12, June 7, 2013 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. How about these possibilities?
•USS Enterprise (alternate reality 2230s)
•USS Enterprise (alternate reality predecessor)
•USS Enterprise (NCC-1701 alternate reality 2230s)
•USS Enterprise (NCC-1701 2230s) --FaNbOy1988 (talk) 01:08, June 8, 2013 (UTC)
I'd say either the third or fourth ones. In order to match our other articles it should have the registry number.--Long Live the United Earth (talk) 03:12, June 8, 2013 (UTC)