As this article is already split in three, might it be worth splitting it into three separate articles? As it's already starting to fill up and will undoubtedly get a lot bigger. Perhaps using captaincies rather than dates though?: Under April and Pike, Kirk's first five year mission, refit? --8of5 18:30, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I'd be fine with this, along the same lines of splitting the "Template:NCC-1701 planets". -- Captain MKB 18:37, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Is there a way to split an article like that while keeping the history on all three resulting articles? --8of5 18:39, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Not in any meaningful way, no. There is the possibility of going through edit-by-edit and merging the edits that exist only in one subsection, but you will lose any edits that edited more than one component section at a time should they exist. -- Captain MKB 18:43, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Sounds like far more than effort than it's worth! --8of5 18:46, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Just an aside, seems like the section names get considerably more complicated by including captaincies. Now that I've seen your "April and Pike" link written, I have to say it might take less space to say "2243 to 2251" or the like. -- Captain MKB 18:55, July 24, 2010 (UTC)